Orbit Post Sitemap
📊 Mid-Term: Cautiously Bullish
$ETH faces ETF outflows and network risks, but record staking and Citi’s higher target support the upside case.
$BTC/$ETH ETF flows have turned negative, signaling softer institutional demand.
👀 Watch ETF flows + staking trends.
#USNFPDataCools #BTCETHETFOutflows #G7OilReserveRelease#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2%
It feels like a black swan is always hanging overhead, ready to dive down at any moment
#10.11了
#经济环境恼火The contract address remaining unchanged does not mean the underlying logic will never change.
Many applications use proxy contracts to store user entry points and states, then forward calls to upgradeable implementation contracts. The address users see remains the same for a long time, but administrators may change the execution logic. Upgradeability facilitates fixing vulnerabilities and adding features, but it can also be exploited by malicious permissions or change the rules users originally accepted after governance votes. To determine if a contract is "immutable," one must not only check the address but also consider the proxy type, administrators, timelocks, and implementation versions. For $ETH users, using an upgradeable protocol means trusting both the current code and the upgrade process simultaneously. Mature designs should disclose changes, allow exit periods, and limit administrator powers; if upgrades can be completed instantly and funds cannot be withdrawn, the risk is much higher than what the interface shows. On-chain records cannot be arbitrarily deleted, but that does not mean every application logic is permanently frozen.
If upgrade governance is controlled by a few keys, the protocol risk is tied to those keys. Timelocks, multisig decentralization, and emergency permission caps are all criteria users use to judge whether they can safely exit. Changes in implementation addresses should trigger a full re-audit rather than automatically inheriting existing trust relationships and conclusions.Trump told Time magazine in an interview that "a certain degree of inflation will also very quickly repay debt." The U.S. federal debt has exceeded $40 trillion, Bitcoin has risen about 300% from its 2023 low, but is still about 30% below the $126,000 peak.
In my opinion, using inflation to erase debt is indeed a slick move: the creditor's money becomes thinner, while the ledger of the currency holder thickens. In the same game, who pays for whom is clear when you flip through your wallet.😇
$BTC $ETHThe most representative mindset in the comment section these days is waiting. Waiting for 60,000, waiting for 70,000, thinking it's too expensive to buy now. I don't quite agree with this way of waiting. The holder structure of Bitcoin has already changed; now most of the chips are in the hands of institutions and whales, and they won't give retail investors many opportunities to bottom-fish comfortably. While you're waiting for 60,000 or 70,000, the price rises from 60,000 to 80,000, and this group still hasn't bought, and most likely won't buy next. The result of waiting is often missing out on the entire cycle. Some ask if feeling they bought too little means they are too obsessed with gains and losses. This thought itself is unnecessary; if you feel you bought too little, just add now, buy directly without leverage, I don't think this position will make you regret it. Others have only bought one-third in spot and want to use low leverage to increase returns on the rest; the order is reversed. If you haven't finished buying spot, don't think about leverage first. How to allocate positions? My advice has always been to focus on spot, and use small leverage contracts for the rest. If you really want to hold long-term, try not to do swing trading in between, don't sell high and buy low repeatedly. You have to first accept profit retracements to hold on. Once you start calculating how much you could have earned when seeing a pullback, then thinking about selling high and buying low again, after doing this calculation many times, you basically can't hold the position. Regarding storage, I keep mine in a wallet, not on exchanges. It's not that exchanges will definitely have problems, but just in case, keeping it in a wallet is obviously safer. If you store it, keep it on Bitcoin's native chain; don't put it on other chains for convenience, that's not truly holding it in your hands. Back to the market. This wave dropped from above 87,200, losing 84,000; many people interpret this as weakening, but I think it's exactly the opposite. Below this level, this water$BTC
The $87K zone looks like a classic long trap, with late buyers potentially providing exit liquidity.
Expect some choppy and unpredictable price action over the weekend, while the lower-timeframe bias remains unchanged.
I’m still scaling into the new short position.
❌ Invalidation: Sustained acceptance above $89K
🎯 Target range: $79K–$83K
Patience and confirmation remain key.$SAND perpetual 50x short position, opened at 0.0758, currently at 0.07317, floating profit +173.48%.
After a failed surge near 0.075, a large bearish candle directly broke the support, so I followed the trend to short, with a stop loss set above 0.076. The 50x leverage position is very small; the movement was weaker than expected, and the percentage loss was nearly doubled!
Moved the stop loss up to 0.074, now watching to see if 0.07 can be broken.
$ETH $BTC #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% "Nonfarm Hammer, BTC and ETH Diverge"
Nonfarm payrolls increased by 29,000, far below the expected 90,000; July-August combined revisions cut 60,000, with July turning negative outright. Once the data was released, BTC first broke out of its consolidation range then fell back, with over 570 million liquidated in 24 hours, cutting both sides of traders.
Regardless of the data's authenticity, the situation is indeed changing: the 10-year US Treasury yield fell back to around 5.18%, oil prices declined, and rate hike expectations shifted to December. Risk assets have gotten a breather.
But capital divergence is deepening. BTC spot ETFs saw an inflow of 102.7 million on Thursday, IBIT alone shouldered nearly 200 million, ending outflows; ETH ETFs have outflowed for three consecutive days, totaling over 110 million in three days. The narrative of a strong BTC and weak ETH is still strengthening.
The SEC hasn’t been idle either: a 760-page new custody rule allows institutions to self-custody crypto assets, and together with the CFTC issued a joint statement clarifying that spot digital commodities can be traded on registered exchanges. Regulatory infrastructure is being built incrementally.
With thin liquidity over the weekend and the National Day holiday, the recovery rally will likely be on low volume. Don’t mistake a rebound for a reversal; wait for volume to return next week.
$BTC $ETH #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% Buying the dip: You can start positioning between 81,000 and 82,000
I prefer to see this downward drop as a dip-buying opportunity.
The mid-to-long-term support is at the bottom of the range, below 82,000 or around 81,000. 81,000 was last week's weekly open price and also the starting point of this upward move. The target is 96,000, which is the result after I recalculated the bullish extension for this segment.
Just hold steady in spot; don't get scared out by the wicks these past few days.
Will you start building your position here? $BTC $ETH #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% U.S. stock trading is about to move to 23/5!!
Nasdaq plans to add a night trading session starting December 6, which will enable U.S. stocks to be traded 23 hours a day, 5 days a week.
Previously, the most direct advantage of HIP-3 was that while traditional markets were closed, trading could still happen on-chain. For example, we also trade U.S. stock contracts without being limited by market opening hours.
But now that TradFi is moving towards 24/7 trading, the scarcity of the 24/7 trading selling point decreases.
Therefore, the next phase of HIP-3's value and advantage may need to be found beyond just trading hours... $SNDK $MU $BTC panic index dropped to 5, an extreme level in history.
The lowest was 5 in 2019, when Bitcoin struggled around $10,000 before starting a rally to $20,000; in 2022, the lowest was 6, with the LUNA crash and Three Arrows Capital collapse, Bitcoin stabilized only after repeatedly bottoming between $17,000 and $20,000. This time the panic index is back to 5, and BTC quickly pulled back from $57,800 with clear support at the low.
But the panic index only indicates extreme pessimism, it does not mean the price has bottomed. After reaching 5 in 2019, the market fluctuated for several months before starting; after reaching 6 in 2022, BTC also struggled around $20,000 until the end of the year before breaking out of the bottom.
To confirm whether $57,800 is the major bottom, we need to see if the pullback can hold, if ETF funds can continue to flow back, and if BTC can regain a stable mid-to-long-term structure. Currently, there are positive signals from ETFs, with about $2.98 billion net inflow over 7 consecutive trading days in mid-September, and the cumulative net inflow for the year has turned positive again, showing institutional support.
But sentiment and funds are only necessary conditions, not sufficient ones. Historical major bottoms often form quietly when no one dares to believe. If $57,800 gives no more chances, this extreme panic will indeed be very interesting.
#BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% Non-farm payroll data fell far short of expectations. Interestingly, BTC and ETH markets fell instead of rising, while the US 10-year Treasury yield remained high.
Comparing the non-farm data from August and September, the difference is like night and day. US September non-farm payrolls increased by only 29,000, far below the market expectation of 90,000; August's new jobs were also revised down from the previously announced 162,000 to 133,000. Logically, this should be bullish for crypto and commodities and bearish for the dollar and US Treasuries, but the market behaved exactly the opposite.
$BTC surged instantly from 86,000 to a high of 87,200 right after the data release, triggering a chase-up-then-sell-off move. After hitting resistance, it quickly fell back, and today the market has been heavily suppressed by bears, oscillating around 84,000.
$ETH showed strong support below. It dropped from yesterday's high of 2,777 to a low near 2,640 support level, then stabilized and oscillated upward to around 2,680. It's really hard to push it down.
$DOGE is the worst hit in terms of risk aversion. The price dropped from a high of 0.097 to a low of 0.090, a 6% decline, with bears firmly suppressing the market and no strength for a rebound.
The above is just my personal market insight and does not constitute any trading advice.Pharaoh's Market Watch]
The Federal Reserve Vice Chairman said AI infrastructure is bringing new inflationary pressures. Is BTC about to be hammered down again?
Pharaoh says directly, this is not a small matter; it’s adding fuel to the bill for AI infrastructure. AI data centers need power, chips, and cooling; electricity, copper, and storage costs are all rising, and these will ultimately translate into inflation. The Fed originally wanted to ease up, but now it has to hold firm, high intereThe thin weak waveform on the ECG represents the coronary artery of $UMA. With only 1.96% amplitude over 24 hours, it seems the vital signs are stable, but the moment my finger touched the pulse, I felt the abnormal beat of ventricular premature contractions.
The lesion is within a short time window. The short-term RSI reading has climbed to 68.0, approaching the overbought red line, which is a precursor to a surge in myocardial oxygen consumption. More dangerously, the Bollinger Bands position—the price has been pushed to 118% of the short-term channel, directly piercing the upper band, like a guidewire puncturing the vessel wall. Combined with the SELL signal, this is not a healthy sinus rhythm; it is the last warning before atrial fibrillation onset.
The long-term RSI is only 45.8, indicating basic cardiac function is still acceptable, but the divergence between short-term and long-term indicators is akin to coronary spasm encountering chronic myocardial ischemia. The current price of $0.36 is at 80% above the middle Bollinger Band, meaning short-term blood pressure is artificially maintained at a high level by medication. Once the medication is withdrawn, perfusion pressure will rapidly collapse.
My surgical plan is clear: no blind bypass surgery, but wait for blood pressure to naturally fall before intervention. The lesion removal point is set at $0.38, which is a resistance level 3.2% above the current price and the optimal clamp position for aortic occlusion.
📉 Short:
Entry: 0.38 (current price +3.2%)
Take Profit 1: 0.34 (-5.4%)
Take Profit 2: 0.35 (-3.0%)
Stop Loss: 0.42 (+15.2%)
The stop loss is set at $0.42, 15.2% above the current price, which is the safety baseline for extracorporeal circulation. It must be admitted that this stop loss margin is relatively large, equivalent to allowing the heart a prolonged tolerance window for cardiac arrest. However, combined with only 0.8% margin above the middle Bollinger Band, the actual risk exposure is compressed within a controllable range.
Target 1 at $0.34 corresponds to 2.0% above the lower Bollinger Band, which is the first observation point for myocardial reperfusion. Target 2 at $0.35 is a 3.1% retracement below the middle band, belonging to the transitional zone before the hemostatic clamp is closed. The distance between the two take profit targets is only 3.0%, indicating this operation has a narrow maneuvering space and requires very high technical skill.
This $UMA patient is not suitable for open-chest surgery. It is only suitable for precise radiofrequency ablation under extracorporeal circulation, stopping once effective. If blood pressure breaks through the $0.42 aortic dissection threshold, immediately terminate the surgery, close the chest, and send to ICU for observation.
The golden window for this surgery is only within the 2-centimeter vascular lumen between $0.36 and $0.38.THORChain ZEC liquidity pool officially activated, a big step forward for privacy coin cross-chain narrative
THORChain has just completed a full network node churn, all nodes have connected and started monitoring the Zcash mainnet, and the ZEC liquidity pool is officially online; the trading function is not fully open yet, this is the most important pre-signal before full implementation.
This is not a temporary snapshot, but the result of long-term technical iteration:
- Earlier protocol upgrades have fully completed ZEC-specific UTXO handling, RPC adaptation, and price oracle integration, fully unlocking native support at the base layer without the need for wrapped assets;
- This full node switch to monitor the Zcash chain and open the liquidity pool is a substantial step from "technical readiness" to "usability";
- The official statement clarifies: the formal trading function is the next phase unlock target; the current pool liquidity is still very shallow, early participation may easily cause significant slippage, so extra caution is needed.
The significance in the broader context is clear:
The privacy sector has long faced delisting from CEXs and narrowing trading channels; THORChain’s native cross-chain solution opens a decentralized entry and exit channel for ZEC without custody or wrapping;
But the pace must be recognized: pool launch ≠ immediate explosion, it still needs time to accumulate depth and wait for the swap function to officially open; whether the market can be driven by the narrative still depends on whether the BTC-ETH overall market sentiment can hold up?PONS dropped about 19%, the perpetual funding rate remains positive, and the price is only about 3.3% higher than the 24-hour low.
As of 20:09 Beijing time, OKEx spot is around $0.4261, with a 24-hour high of $0.5366 and a low of $0.4124, a volatility of about 30.1%; trading volume is about $10.13 million, approximately 1.8 times the median of the past 7 full trading days.
OKEx data shows the current nominal value of perpetual open interest is about $12.18 million, the funding rate is about 0.0051%, and the perpetual contract is trading at a discount of about 0.05% compared to spot. After the sharp price drop, longs are still paying to hold positions, but the perpetual contract has not shown a significant premium.
My judgment is that selling pressure has pushed the price to the intraday low, but leveraged longs have not fully exited yet. This currently looks more like a weak rebound during risk release rather than a clear bottom. The most common misjudgment is interpreting a positive funding rate as confidence in the bottom; during a downtrend, it may also mean longs are still bearing costs.
Next, watch $0.4124 and $0.4327. If the low holds and the price climbs back above the latter while the funding rate falls, the support can be considered improved; if the low breaks and the funding rate remains positive, the remaining longs reducing positions may continue to amplify volatility.
$PONS [Old Chive Observation] $DOGE
This time DOGE is finally seriously working on the "application layer." On September 30, DogeOS officially opened its public beta.
What it does is simple: it makes DOGE not just for transfers and price speculation, but truly capable of running DeFi. DogeOS is an EVM-compatible application layer, and developers can already test: trading, lending, stablecoins, prediction markets, and games.
Moreover, transaction fees are paid in DOGE. This means that if the DOGE ecosystem really takes off in the future, DOGE's use won't just be: "buy and wait for the price to rise."
Instead, it can enter lending, trading, and on-chain applications.
This is actually a pretty big change. Because Dogecoin's own main chain was not originally designed for smart contracts. Now DogeOS is essentially adding an application environment alongside DOGE, bringing over the Ethereum ecosystem's development approach.
But there are two points to note here.
First:
It is currently only a testnet.
DogeOS has not announced an official mainnet launch date yet.
Second:
The security mechanism of this system has not yet been fully handed over to Dogecoin miners. In other words, there is still some distance before it can be truly used on a large scale. Grayscale data shows that the AI crypto sector surged 54% in September, doubling the overall market's gains, with leaders like NEAR even doubling within the month. The logic behind this is clear: when BTC and ETH are heavily suppressed by macro interest rates, existing funds tend to speculate in niche sectors with large narrative space but smaller market caps, such as "AI + intelligent economy" (the sector's total market cap is only $15 billion).
However, for spot traders, this is precisely the most dangerous signal. With ETF funds turning net outflows and long-term US Treasury yields remaining high, this localized frenzy essentially reflects a zero-sum game amid liquidity contraction. It's easy to pump small-cap sectors, but once macro sentiment worsens or the broader market turns down, the resulting panic sell-off will be extremely severe.
Practical advice: If you already hold related tokens, now is an excellent time to take profits in batches and secure gains—don't fantasize about selling at the peak; if you are currently out of the market, do not be tempted by the 54% rally to chase prices higher, as entering now is like grabbing fire. Keep sufficient cash on hand, maintain your core positions, and wait for macro pressures to fully ease before making right-side trades.The piece is placed on d5, not because it is safe, but because it forces you to make the first move. $T is exactly this d5—down 4.65% in 24 hours. Most see it as bleeding losses; I see the opponent voluntarily giving up control of the center.
First, let's lay out the board. The bears have just pushed a pawn forward by one square, but the formation is already showing cracks: the short-term RSI reads 35.8, which my system marks as "mildly oversold," having entered the trigger zone below 38; the long-term RSI is 44.8, still hovering in neutral territory. What does this mean? It means this is not a collapse or a rout, but a controlled squeeze. Short-term pressure with long-term support—typical pawn sacrifice for initiative, sacrificing sentiment while preserving structure.
Next, look at the space. In the short-term Bollinger Bands, the price is only at 24% of the range, just 0.9% from the lower band and still 2.8% room to the upper band; the mid-term is even more extreme, at 14%, with the lower band 1.2% away but the upper band far above at 7.2%. This is a board compressed to the edge: downward space is less than a pawn's step away, while upward space is six times that. In chess, we call this "piece efficiency imbalance"—the same rooks and knights, but the opponent is all crowded on the back wing, unable to expand.
My move plan is to wait for a turn first. The current price is not the square I want; I want a pullback to the entry point—3.7% below the current price—where I will place my back-wing knight, waiting for the opponent to push the pawn into the square I have preset. This is a standard bait structure, not bottom fishing, but positioning.
📈 Long:
Entry: Current price -3.7%
Take Profit 1: Current price +5.7%
Take Profit 2: Current price +7.2%
Stop Loss: Current price -13.2%
Note this ratio: Target 1 requires only a 5.7% advance, while stop loss allows a 13.2% margin of error. From a win-rate calculation perspective, this is not a pretty board—this is an endgame that must rely on positional advantage to compensate for win rate. So position size must be light, execution must wait, and stop loss must be firm. Any premature entry above the entry point is like sacrificing the queen on the third move of the opening—not aggressive, but suicidal.
The real risk is not at the -13.2% stop loss line, but in time. The short-term RSI at 35.8 can continue to fall to 25, and the mid-term 44.8 can slide down to 30. The most expensive thing on the board is never the pieces, but the number of moves. What I need to see is RSI divergence forming at low levels and Bollinger Bands breaking upward from the 14% position—that is the signal the opponent has lost on time.
Endgame theory lesson one: When the opponent has only a passed pawn left and you have a rook, don’t rush to exchange pieces; first, move your king to the right position. The right position now is to wait—wait for that -3.7% entry to open, wait for the 7.2% upper band to become my promotion square.
I have played chess for thirty-two years and trust only one iron rule: not every move must win, but to make the opponent have no moves left at every step. #strategyplaybook$ZEC isn’t just facing a technical pullback.
ETF flows have turned negative, privacy-related concerns are rising, whales reportedly took profits, $76.59M in longs were liquidated near $1,333, and OI dropped 38%.
The key level now is $1,233. Hold it, and a volatile recovery remains possible. Lose it, and downside risk increases.
No bottom-fishing—wait for confirmation. $BTC $ETH
#USNFPDataCools
#BTCETHETFOutflows #G7OilReserveRelease The net inflow of the SOL spot ETF this week is only about $800,000, while last week it was about $188.1 million, showing a sharp drop in hot money.
Observed: Binance current price is about 119.5, down about 2.1% in 24 hours, with a high of about 123.4 and a low of about 117.1.
According to Farside, the total net inflow of the spot SOL ETF this week (9/28 to 10/2) is about $800,000, compared to about $188.1 million in the same period last week, shrinking nearly 235 times.
On Friday alone, there was an inflow of about $1.3 million, but on Wednesday and Thursday combined, there was a net outflow of about $13.6 million. Funds have shifted from aggressive inflows to fluctuating in and out.
The price surged to about 123.8 yesterday but then fell back to around 118; today it hovers around 119, the market looks stable, but the capital flow is actually cooling down.
During the same period, the ETH spot ETF had a net outflow of about $118 million this week, and BTC weekly inflow dropped from about $2.39 billion to about $82.9 million. The three major spot ETFs have all cooled off.
My view: The SOL ETF, which was aggressively accumulating last week, has almost stopped this week. Don't mistake sideways trading for continued hot money inflows.
What to do: Observe and don't chase; if it falls below about 117, it's invalidated; only consider continuation if it holds above about 123.8. If it breaks the low, admit that this rebound lacks institutional support.
Do you believe this is a normal cooldown, or that institutions are rotating into BTC?
$SOL $ETH $BTCThe facade is still being covered with curtain walls, but the reinforcement ratio of the load-bearing columns is only half of the design value—I'm not entering this kind of building; I'm going short.
$STRK has just completed a typical cantilevered addition: a 5.27% increase in 24 hours, pushing the price to 94% of the short-term Bollinger Band range, leaving only 0.2% space to the upper band. This is not structural strength; it's temporary support. Anyone who has worked on high-rises knows that the closer to the top closure, the more exaggerated the wind load leverage effect—the short-term RSI has hit 71, officially entering the overbought zone, while the long-term RSI is only 57, still within the normal stress range. The severe mismatch between upper and lower stress is the most standard signal of local overload.
Looking at the mid-term Bollinger Band, the price stands at 104%, forcibly crossing the upper band by 0.3%, but is 9.1% away from the lower band—this is not a breakout; it's hanging in the air. The cantilevered component has no pull-back anchoring and will sooner or later fall back to the column grid to find support.
The foundation that truly determines this building's residual value—the ground floor structure, development pace, and long-term scalability—has not poured even a cubic meter of concrete into this 5.27%. The white paper is just a design drawing; drawings do not resist shear. So my judgment is straightforward: this is not an added floor; it's scaffolding.
The trading plan is executed according to the blueprint, leaving no extra expansion joints:
📉 Short:
Entry: $0.03 (current price +2.4%, wait until the last piece of scaffolding is set up before entering)
Take Profit 1: $0.03 (-5.9%, first structural pullback level)
Take Profit 2: $0.03 (-8.4%, back to the foundation cap area)
Stop Loss: $0.04 (14.0% above entry, if it truly breaks and holds above the upper band, it means my load calculation is overturned)
Setting entry 2.4% above the current price allows for its final rebound margin; the 14% stop loss structural buffer is reserved for false break deformation gaps. This risk-reward ratio works on paper and holds on site.
The mid-term band has already crossed 0.3%, and the short-term is sticking to the upper band by 0.2%—this is not topping out; it's the last shake before formwork removal.
Structural calculations fail; I will not accept any of these temporary supports.Conclusion first: OKX launched five new stock perpetual contracts last week: H100, ACN, NKE, BWET, and SECZ. Tokenized stocks are no longer a novelty on crypto exchanges.
Data: H100's first day high was 2.99, low 2.55, with a 17% amplitude, currently at 2.68; ACN dropped from 215 to 200, down 7%. These are not coins, but stocks, yet you can trade them 24/7 on OKX using USDT without waiting for the US stock market to open.
My view: The liquidity pool is still shallow (H100 24h volume about 840,000 USD), slippage is large, so don't take heavy positions. But it has opened a door—going forward, you can go long or short stocks on crypto exchanges without needing a brokerage account.
What do you think? Is this tokenized stock perpetual contract a real demand or just a concept? $H100 The chip concentration zone is far more valuable as a reference than integer price levels 🧱
Many people blindly trust integer price levels, but the real long-short battles happen in the chip concentration zones formed by historical transaction accumulation.
$BTC, integer price points are just psychological barriers, easily pierced by spikes, while chip concentration zones represent real support and resistance; GALA, a blockchain gaming project, faces huge selling pressure to break free when rebounding into historical chip lock-up zones; $REN, a cross-chain privacy bridge, experiences intense long-short contention when the price reaches chip bands.
Instant spikes piercing through chip zones do not count as valid breakouts; confirmation requires closing firmly above.
Do not use integer numbers as trading bases; focus on chip positions with dense historical transactions.
When encountering chip concentration zones, do not rush to trade breakouts; wait for confirmation signals from the market.
#BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温
#美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备
#SEC加密资产托管新规，拟放宽机构自托管限制 $BNB 4h bullish, RSI 51.3 mid-level; 1h RSI 52.5 slightly high, MACD upward
Range: 767.82–769.21 (1h pullback zone), currently within the zone
Timing: Within the pullback zone, suitable for reference (do not chase the rally).
Window: About 4–12 hours (1–3 bars of 4h); ends when reaching target or invalidated, do not hold stubbornly.
Upside target: 784
Invalidation: Break below 766.77
After invalidation: Wait to retake EMA55
Discipline: Follow the trend when chasing
$BTC 4h bullish, RSI 52.1 mid-level; 1h RSI 46 mid-level, MACD upward
Range: 84582–84718 (1h pullback zone), currently within the zone
Timing: Within the pullback zone, suitable for reference (do not chase the rally).
Window: About 4–12 hours (1–3 bars of 4h); ends when reaching target or invalidated, do not hold stubbornly.
Upside target: 87222
Invalidation: Break below 83828
After invalidation: Wait to retake EMA55
Discipline: Follow the trend when chasing
For analysis only, not advice or order instructions.$SUI is slightly strong on the 4h timeframe, RSI 54.6 is relatively high; 1h RSI 59.3 at the upper edge, MACD trending upward
Range: 1.15–1.16 (1h pullback zone), currently above the range, waiting for pullback
Timing: Slightly high above the range, wait for pullback to confirm.
Window: About 4–12 hours (1–3 bars of 4h); ends when the upper target is reached or invalidated, do not hold stubbornly.
Upside target: 1.22
Invalidation: Break below 1.12
After invalidation: Wait to retake EMA55
Discipline: Enter only after pullback
$UNI is long on 4h, RSI 54.4 at the upper edge; 1h RSI 57.4 at the upper edge, MACD trending downward
Range: 9.04–9.1 (1h pullback zone), currently above the range, waiting for pullback
Timing: Slightly high above the range, wait for pullback to confirm.
Window: About 4–12 hours (1–3 bars of 4h); ends when the upper target is reached or invalidated, do not hold stubbornly.
Upside target: 9.32
Invalidation: Break below 8.99
After invalidation: Wait to retake EMA55
Discipline: Not recommended to chase
For analysis only, not advice or order instruction.The US-Iran situation is tense, and the G7 plans to release up to 100 million barrels of reserves. Risk appetite is warming up, driving UNI slightly higher. I judge the short-term bias to be bullish, but there is still heavy resistance above; a breakout requires volume support. In the past 24 hours, UNI rose 2.1%, priced at 9.189. The intraday high of 9.319 met resistance and pulled back, while the low of 8.568 was supported. Trading volume was 15.42 million. Both the 1-hour and 4-hour trends are upward, but the price is still 14.22% below the 4-hour high, indicating the rebound has not yet recovered the mid-term losses. The order book's top 10 bid-ask ratio is 1.41, favoring buyers. The funding rate is only 0.0037%, with open interest at 5.62 million. Bullish sentiment is moderate and not overheated. Strategically, if the price pulls back and stabilizes at 8.793, a light long position can be taken with a stop loss at 8.541 and a target of 9.487. If there is a volume breakout above 9.332, increase long positions with a stop loss at 9.108 and a target of 9.672, keeping the position size within 20%.
— This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wishing you successful trading. —
$UNI#美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备
#美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 $UNI AMD plans to invest $8.2 billion to acquire an AI company, indicating that traditional computing power giants are accelerating the acquisition of AI assets. If market risk appetite warms up, high-beta targets like BSB often benefit first. I lean slightly bullish in the short term. The current quote is 0.0999, down 0.7% in 24 hours, with a range from 0.09332 to 0.104, a turnover of 1.578 million, and a funding rate of 0.0050% showing mild bullish sentiment. The 1-hour level is weakening, down 4.32% from the high, but the 4-hour level remains in an upward structure, 9.28% above the low, indicating the correction has not broken the mid-term rhythm; the order book's top 10 buy-sell ratio is 1.80, with 3,670 buy orders versus 2,039 sell orders, showing a significantly stronger willingness to buy. Strategically, if it pulls back to 0.09685 and stabilizes, one can lightly go long with a stop loss at 0.09315 and a target of 0.10435; if it breaks through 0.10435 with volume, then chase the long with a stop loss at 0.10120 and a target of 0.10880. Position control should be within 20%, and do not hold if stop loss is broken.
— This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wish you successful trading. —
$BSB#OpenAI plans a $1.4 trillion valuation raising $30 billion
#AMD plans to invest $8.2 billion to acquire an AI company $BSB BTC just made a move up, now wobbling back to 84672, ETH also returned to 2684 dollars. Brothers, this market looks lively, but it's actually not time to relax yet.
US Treasury yields have fallen, PCE isn't as scary, and market worries about the Fed continuing to raise rates have eased a lot, so risk assets finally caught a breather.
Right now, BTC focuses on three key levels:
Around 84600, first see if it can hold steady. If it climbs back above 85K, there's a chance to test 86K-87K again; if it breaks through 87K with volume, then look at 88K or even 90K.
Below, 83K-84K is critical support. If it holds, I'll keep some positions to observe; if it breaks 83K with volume, I'll actively reduce positions, looking down to 82K, and in an extreme case 80.5K-81K.
ETH is now at 2684, focusing on 2700 and 2800. First reclaim 2700, then talk about breaking 2800; if 2700 can't hold, don't get too greedy in the short term.
My own strategy is simple: light positions, wait for confirmation, don't chase the rally. Follow with small positions on breakouts above resistance, consider adding after support holds on pullbacks, and exit if support breaks—don't stubbornly fight the market.
What I fear most now is chasing after every rise; control your hands, don't get carried away. I only dare to hold light positions waiting for stronger market signals.
Of course, choices aren't limited to BTC and ETH; coins like SOL, UNI, ZEC, which have performed well recently, can also be considered.
#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% $DOGE I've been following it for a long time too, but it just hasn't gone up.
The first thing I bought was Dogecoin, which was very popular back then, but not anymore.
The purchase price at that time was also very high, 2.1 yuan each, one unit was the starting point.
I didn't expect that to be the highest point then and also the highest point now. It's crazy.
Now with high debt interest rates for a long time, and Musk's calls have no effect.
Another point is that this token has no burn mechanism and increases infinitely.
From this perspective, doge seems to have no future to look forward to.
Now I no longer expect to make money, just hope to break even!!!
#BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 AMD plans to spend $8.2 billion to acquire an AI company, and the computing power narrative often drives sentiment for assets like CL. However, I judge this to be only a short-term catalyst; overall, CL remains in a downtrend channel, so chasing longs requires very strict discipline.
24h up 1.6% to 91.14, the high of 91.97 was not broken, with a relatively thin turnover of 11.62 million. 4-hour down 6.62%, 1-hour up 2.48%, showing divergence across different timeframes. The buy-sell ratio is 0.92, with sellers slightly dominant, funding rate 0.0000%, open interest 366,000, sentiment neutral with no forced liquidation.
Strategy 1: Light short position on rebound to 92.35, stop loss at 93.15, target 88.85. Strategy 2: Test long position on pullback to 88.65 if stabilized, stop loss at 87.75, target 91.55. Single trade risk should not exceed 2% of total position; place orders first and wait for triggers.
— This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wish you successful trading. —
$CL#OpenAI plans $1.4 trillion valuation raising $30 billion
#AMD拟斥资82亿美元收购AI公司 $CL Family, who understands this? 🤣 ETH this round has perfectly played the role of the “crypto world’s laid-back second-in-command”!
Just rushed up to a small peak at 2807, then immediately switched to “precise sideways” mode. Now it’s stuck right at 2684, with MA5 and MA10 almost merged into a single line. The price is just rubbing back and forth on this line, dropping only 0.46% in a day, almost flat over 7 days, not giving you any decent volatility, basically saying, “As long as big brother BTC moves sideways, I’ll move sideways with it.”
What’s even funnier is that it rose 51% over 90 days, but only 6% over 30 days. So this thing’s life motto is basically “rise, then lie flat until you lose your temper.” Other coins jump up and down every day, but ETH practices Tai Chi on the moving averages, making those chasing highs or shorting give up and uninstall their apps. Even good news from MetaMask can’t stir it up at all.
Current state of holding ETH: it moves sideways, let it move sideways; I lie flat, let it move sideways. Anyway, it’s up almost half in half a year. Let it grind; it’s better than those crazy altcoins dropping 10% a day. No need to watch the market during the National Day holiday; it won’t rise or fall, just here to accompany you into retirement. Nonfarm payrolls increased by only 29,000, far below expectations. The market is betting on a rate cut, and after shorts were forcibly liquidated, the price surged above 87,000. However, the current price near 84,695 shows RSI overbought and a pullback, with moving averages converging, so a short-term wait for a retest confirmation is needed.
On the liquidation side, there is a dense short liquidation zone near 83,362 below. If the price falls to this area, it is likely to trigger a liquidity rebound. At the same time, there is a large accumulation of long liquidations near 82,282, forming a secondary support. Above, there is high-leverage short pressure near 85,342, which is the primary short-term test level.
After finishing this trade, I stopped by the roadside to catch my breath and wiped off the sweat.
In terms of operation, it is recommended to gradually enter long positions in the 83,600 to 84,200 range, with a stop loss below 82,900. If it breaks below 82,282, abandon the logic. Take profit is first expected at 85,200, and after breaking through, look towards the 86,200 level.
$BTC
#Anthropic拟11月启动IPO，目标于感恩节前上市
@OKX星球 Strategy's repurchase of BTC drives a wave of treasury accumulation, with MMT benefiting indirectly as a small-cap coin, though capital outflow is limited. I judge the short-term trend as slightly bullish, but caution is advised when chasing highs. The one-hour and four-hour trends are both upward; the current price of 0.1867 has risen nearly 45% from the four-hour low but is constrained by the intraday high of 0.1905. The top ten buy orders in the order book total 16,000, surpassing the 13,000 sell orders, with a strength ratio of 1.22 indicating active absorption. The funding rate is only 0.0050%, showing the bulls are not overheated, and the open interest of 8,403,000 coins does not indicate crowding. A light long position can be taken on a pullback to 0.1835, with a stop loss at 0.1788 and a target of 0.1932; if volume breaks through 0.1912, increase the position, keeping it within 20% and strictly observing the stop loss.
——This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wishing you successful trading.——
$MMT #BTC and ETH spot ETFs are simultaneously flowing out, cooling capital enthusiasm
#Strategy再购BTC，多家财库同步增持 $MMT In the past period, ETH has consistently failed to effectively break above the $2,800 resistance, while the support around $2,600 has not been completely broken either, so overall it remains in a tug-of-war between bulls and bears. However, from a technical perspective, the short-term correction risk is gradually increasing. 📉 The MACD has already shown some signs of bearish divergence, and the daily momentum is starting to weaken. If the subsequent bars turn further negative, it would mean bears may gradually take control. On the macro side, attention is also needed: 🇺🇸 The US added only 29,000 nonfarm jobs in September, significantly below market expectations, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.2%. Cooling in the labor market may affect the Fed's future policy expectations. (Bureau of Labor Statistics) 💰 Regarding ETF funds, after seven consecutive trading days of net inflows into the ETH spot ETF, on September 29 it recorded a net outflow of about $2.81 million, indicating a cooling in fund sentiment. (PrimeXBT) 🌍 Meanwhile, the US-Iran situation and uncertainties in the energy market may still bring additional pressure to risk assets. Therefore, key levels to watch next are: 🔹 $2,750–$2,800: key resistance above 🔹 $2,650: important short-term support 🔹 $2,600: lower boundary of the range 🔹 If it breaks below $2,600, the next area to watch is $2,520–$2,550. Currently, it is still not simple to judge that the ETH trend has reversed, but if the price$DOGE spot price is 0.09263. The DogeOS public testnet launched on September 30, claiming to use DOGE as Gas without issuing additional tokens; the mainnet launch date has not been announced yet. The news has been hot for a few days, but the price is still stuck just below 0.10.
The lowest point in the early morning touched 0.09033, the 24-hour high of 0.09775 is still on the chart, but the current price has moved away from it. It dropped to the low and then bounced back, now standing at 0.09263, still some distance from the 0.10 mark.
A testnet does not mean mainnet usage has increased. Anyone using "L2 is coming" as a reason to chase longs now should wait for the mainnet and real transaction volume, not just a public testnet announcement.
Let's first watch which breaks first, 0.09 or 0.10, no rush to react to the public testnet news.
#DOGEThe wave of treasury accumulation rises again, with strategy funds increasing Bitcoin holdings driving market sentiment, but $SNDK did not follow the strength and instead faced pressure alone. My judgment is short-term weak oscillation with an undetermined breakout direction.
Down 2.3% in 24 hours, the price slid from a high of 1788.4 to 1718, with a turnover of only 353,000, showing low volume. Although the 1-hour level is climbing, the 4-hour trend is clearly downward. The order book buy-sell ratio is 0.74, with selling pressure dominant; funding rate is zero, and open interest is 44,000, with neither bulls nor bears daring to increase positions.
If it rebounds to 1729.6 and faces resistance, a light short position can be taken with a stop loss at 1752.3 and a target of 1684.5; if volume breaks below 1701.8, then chase the short with a stop loss at 1726.4 and a target of 1658.2. Position control should be within 20%, and avoid heavy positions before volume expands.
— This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wishing you successful trading. —
$SNDK#Strategy再购BTC，多家财库同步增持
#Strategy再购BTC，多家财库同步增持 $SNDK MetaMask disclosed an infrastructure security incident on October 1, proactively exiting related Ethereum validators. The company said there was no immediate threat to wallets at that time. Researchers estimate about 17,000 validators and 523,000 ETH are exiting, but MetaMask has not confirmed this scale. The block rewards transferred to abnormal addresses are estimated by researchers to be about 0.36 ETH. CoinDesk separated the official statement and researcher estimates in their report that day.
Lido said the affected validators are expected to stop staking by October 7. Tokens need to be withdrawn and queued again, which may take about 45 days, with some loss of rewards in between. For stETH holders, Lido said no action is needed on their part. There have been no reports of penalties or slashing. As of Saturday, this exit timeline is still in place; the issue was disclosed on Thursday.
Currently, what can be verified is the exit and reward gap. Wallets being drained and 520,000 ETH being dumped immediately on the spot market have not been confirmed. The latter quantity remains an estimate.
$ETH was at 2678.85 early Saturday, closer to the 24-hour low of 2651, with a high of 2778.6 not sustained. The price is soft, overlapping with the timing of this incident; other reasons for the softness include consecutive net outflows from the Ethereum ETF in U.S. stocks. These two issues should not be conflated into one conclusion. The exit process will reach Lido's stated point next week; for now, watch and do not rush to act.BLAST has been placed on the trading watchlist by Bithumb because the Blast Foundation has announced plans to end mainnet operations.
Such alerts are usually more than just "sentiment reminders"; they represent a direct statement from the exchange regarding the project's sustainability risks. For BLAST, the shutdown of the mainnet will weaken the token's utility, ecosystem continuity, and exchange support stability, and it may face further risk control measures, restrictions, or even delisting reviews.
There are two more realistic observations in the market: one is that the short-term rebound looks more like sentiment repair, and the other is that the exchange's subsequent review results and the progress of on-chain asset withdrawals will directly affect liquidity expectations. Will BLAST be able to maintain its main liquidity, or will it continue to face tightened risk controls?
Source: BlockBeats
#BLASTBrothers, seeing this set of data made me gasp coldly...
The $TRUMP team’s behavior really treats us like an ATM! In 8 months, they quietly transferred 81.87 million tokens through exchanges, with an average price of 3.04, directly pocketing 249 million USD.
What’s the most amazing? The team holds 80% of the chips in total! After selling for a while, they only sold 8.2%, still holding 71.8%. At the current price, that’s a floating profit of 1.49 billion USD! Wow, their money printing machine is more efficient than any other, right?
Let’s be honest, for projects with such high control over the supply, retail investors playing contracts or buying spot are just pure liquidity providers. The project team holds 70% of the chips, they can pump or dump at will. Even a small sell-off makes the market shake; this huge selling pressure is like the sword of Damocles hanging overhead.
But on the other hand, the crypto world is all about consensus and hype. The "King of Understanding" naturally attracts traffic, no matter how concentrated the chips are, people still rush in one after another.Recently, market sentiment has clearly tilted bullish, with Bitcoin $BTC briefly reclaiming above $86,000. Many traders started chasing the rally, and some took long positions near $87,000. However, I choose to continue observing the bearish logic. The macro environment still faces pressure. The US 10-year Treasury yield recently rose back above approximately 5.2%, and funding costs along with risk-off sentiment may still limit the upside for high-volatility assets. Meanwhile, Crypto ETF funds have begun to show clear divergence: as of October 2, the US spot BTC ETF saw a net inflow of about $82.9M over the past week, while the ETH ETF experienced a net outflow of about $118M in the same period, indicating a noticeable cooling in capital enthusiasm compared to before. This does not mean the bull market is over, but the risk is increasing if the short-term rally continues to chase higher. My scenario is: 📉 First target: $81,000–$82,000 📉 If longs continue to crowd in: around $76,000 📉 In extreme cases: $71,000–$72,000 If BTC undergoes a deep pullback, it will clear leveraged longs who chased the highs and allow lower-position holders to take some profits, potentially restoring a healthier market structure. Of course, BTC still maintains strong resilience, and the spot BTC ETF recorded a strong inflow of about $2.39B in the previous week, so the trend cannot be judged as reversed based on just a few days of data. Therefore, the most important thing now is not to blindly be bullish or OpenAI plans to raise 30 billion at a valuation of 1.4 trillion, and the AI narrative spillover has brought attention assets like KAITO back into focus, but the positive news is unlikely to change the short-term weakness; I tend to be bearish with oscillation. The four-hour low has risen by 14.51%, but the one-hour has fallen by 6.15%, indicating a conflict between long and short cycles, showing that bulls are reducing positions rather than exiting. The current price is 0.3373, down 4.4%, with a volume of 28.807 million; the top ten buy and sell orders are almost balanced, the funding rate is only 0.0028%, open interest is 11.43 million, sentiment is cold but not panicked. Strategy: lightly short at a rebound to 0.3475, stop loss at 0.3565, target 0.3185; if it falls sharply to 0.3145, go long, stop loss at 0.3065, target 0.3345. Position size should not exceed 20%, exit if broken.
— For personal reference only, not investment advice, wish you smooth trading. —
$KAITO#OpenAI拟1.4万亿美元估值融资300亿美元
#OpenAI拟1.4万亿美元估值融资300亿美元 $KAITO Scaffolding isn't even stable yet, but they're already daring to lay bricks on top; this building is bound to have a safety accident sooner or later.
In sandbox simulations, I've built dozens of hundred-meter-high buildings, pulling back 20% without even blinking. Today, for the first time, I took out the real money I earned from moving bricks, and watching the red and green numbers jump on the $AAVE chart, my hand holding the trowel actually started trembling. Usually, carrying cement on the construction site fills me with strength, but now staring at the screen, my heartbeat is faster than a pile driver.
The current market is like a freshly poured foundation layer. The price is hovering around 182.35, the 1-hour Bollinger Band middle line at 180.6 is like a firmly embedded steel rebar foundation, supporting the base; the lower band at 177.9 is the last bearing platform. As long as this doesn't collapse, the formwork above can continue to be built upward.
The RSI is oscillating at 58.1, indicating the mixer above is still discharging at a steady rate; the bulls' cement hasn't fully set yet. The upper band at 183.3 pressing overhead is like a freshly supported cast-in-place beam formwork. Although my hands are shaking badly, the verticality of this load-bearing column is currently fine. For this first shovel of mortar, I have to grit my teeth and apply it.
- Target: $AAVE 🟢
- Entry: 181.5 - 182.8
- TP1: 184.5
- TP2: 187.2
- SL: 177.5
As long as cracks or broken rebar appear at the lower bearing platform 177.5, no matter how high it’s built, immediately pull out the safety net and evacuate the site.
#CoinMoveAlert 🏗️Brothers, how did the spot ETFs of BTC and ETH start flowing out together? Let me break it down for you.
Why are they running together?
First, the non-farm payrolls good news was realized, and institutions are taking profits. Before the data was released, funds had already positioned long; now that the good news is out, they are redeeming and cashing out.
Second, institutions are starting to hesitate. Poor employment indeed delayed rate hikes, but the market is already worried about "too poor employment leading to recession," so no one dares to keep adding crypto positions; they reduce positions first.
Third, this thing self-reinforces. Prices don’t rebound, more people redeem; redemptions hit the spot market, prices fail to rise further, creating a vicious cycle.
Bull or bear?
In the medium term, the big picture of non-farm payrolls being positive hasn’t changed, and the rate hike delay is real. But the short-term simultaneous ETF outflows are a bearish signal—BTC’s biggest buyers have shrunk, rebounds lack incremental funds; ETH’s funds are withdrawing even faster, indicating institutions are not optimistic about altcoins and the Ethereum ecosystem either.
What’s next?
In the short term, 1-3 days will likely be volatile, but don’t expect big bullish candles. Macro tailwinds will prevent a crash, but ETF redemptions cap the upside, making it easy to spike and then fall back. Every step BTC rises, someone sells; ETH, due to its higher elasticity but with funds running away, will have weaker gains than BTC.
#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 $BTC $ETH OpenAI plans to raise 30 billion at a valuation of 1.4 trillion, AI narratives continue to attract capital, but funds have not spilled over to SOL. I judge that the short term is still dominated by technical factors. Currently at 119.35, down 1.8%, hitting a low of 117.03 before being pulled back, the four-hour distance from the low is already 19.46%, the bottom rising structure is intact, and the pullback is a healthy consolidation. The top 10 buy orders total 16,000, surpassing the sell orders of 8,852, with a strength ratio of 1.81, funding rate only 0.01%, positions at 3.005 million, longs are not crowded, shorts have not dared to add, sentiment is neutral. Strategy: buy on the dip at 118.15, stop loss at 116.85, target 122.45; if volume breaks through 123.34, chase, stop loss at 121.85, target 126.05. Position control within 20%, do not hold if stop loss is broken.
— Personal opinion only, not investment advice, wish you successful trading. —
$SOL#OpenAI拟1.4万亿美元估值融资300亿美元
#OpenAI拟1.4万亿美元估值融资300亿美元 $SOL $SOL spot price is 119.1. The 24-hour open was 118.76, the highest 123.79, the lowest 117.13, and Shanghai midnight at 119.99. Bitcoin experienced fluctuations of over three thousand dollars up and down, SOL fell back from its high point, still slightly higher relative to its own opening price, with a smaller volatility range.
On October 2, the US stock market Solana spot ETF, Farside, had a total net inflow of about 1.3 million USD, almost all recorded on BSOL. The cumulative scale is about 1.6 billion USD, so 1.3 million is just a drop in the bucket. At the price of 119, there is no sign of large subscriptions pushing it up, nor concentrated redemptions suppressing it.
117 is the low point in these 24 hours, 124 is the high point, and 119 is stopped in the middle but slightly higher. Shanghai midnight is 119.99, the morning session is slightly lower than that position, meaning it gave back a little after midnight, but did not return to 117. There are no new macro figures over the weekend, and this range has not been broken yet.
Just hold for now. Bitcoin giving back its gains does not automatically become a reason to chase SOL; a daily subscription of 1.3 million is still not enough to prove a weakening trend.
#solNonfarm payrolls are just the appetizer; CPI is the main course
Tonight's nonfarm payrolls have the market on edge again. BTC hovers around 86,000, ETH around 2,724, all waiting for the data to provide direction.
But the Fed is currently more focused on inflation. CPI ranks first, PCE second, and nonfarm payrolls at best third. As long as inflation cools down, even if employment heats up, there's justification for rate cuts.
Last month's nonfarm payrolls exceeded expectations, yet the market still rose after the initial drop; when PCE fell, the market rallied immediately. This shows employment isn't the main issue—it's inflation.
So for tonight's nonfarm payrolls, a worse-than-expected drop can be seen as a golden buying opportunity, while a better-than-expected rise shouldn't be chased. The real tone will be set by next month's CPI.
BTC could move around 86,000 either way; don't change your beliefs based on a single data point. ETH fluctuates around 2,724; keep holding short positions at 2,671 and wait for CPI. Also hold long positions in Tesla and Google; fundamentals remain solid.
Remember: nonfarm payrolls are the appetizer, don't get too full—the main course is yet to come.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC
#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% When SpaceX went public, investors compared two options: Bitcoin or SpaceX IPO.
Since June 12, Bitcoin has risen by more than 35%, while SpaceX has dropped about 8%.
Anthropic, one of the AI leaders, is reportedly preparing for an IPO with a valuation of $1.8–2 trillion.
This is more than the entire Bitcoin market cap, which is about $1.7 trillion.
AI is already changing the economy, but belief in AI does not mean that a specific company is a profitable investment at $2 trillion.
It is reported that Anthropic may raise up to $100 billion during the IPO. The company also reportedly has commitments of more than $500 billion for computing over a decade. Slowing growth could create significant financial pressure.
The 10x math is illustrative.
If Anthropic is valued at $2 trillion, for a 10-fold investment growth the company must reach $20 trillion.
For BTC at prices around $85,000, 10x means $850,000 per BTC. With a supply of 21 million coins, that is about $17 trillion in market cap.
So the ultimate target for 10x is not that different: about $17 trillion for Bitcoin versus $20 trillion for Anthropic.
Anthropic depends on management, competition, profitability, computing costs, and access to capital. New shares may dilute investors' stakes.
Bitcoin has no CEO, corporate expenses, or contracts worth hundreds of billions of dollars.
It is impossible to just create another $500 billion BTC to fund a new data center. Its supply is limited to 21 million coins.
If AI creates trillions of dollars of new value, it is unclear who will benefit: Anthropic, OpenAI, NVIDIA, Amazon, Google, energy companies, or consumers through cheaper products.
Investing in an AI company requires identifying the specific winner of this race.
Bitcoin does not require such a choice: it is a bet on a digital asset with a fixed supply.
So these are two different investment models: a bet on a company or an asset with a predetermined supply.Just brushed away this layer of sedimentary rock, and the stratigraphic layer before my eyes made me laugh out loud—aren't these the shards of the last revelry wine glass from Pompeii?
Under the sun, there really is nothing new. Every time the market fluctuates, retail investors cry and panic at the bottom of the ruins pit; actually, two thousand years ago, Roman slaves betting in the Colosseum had the same expression. Currently, $BCH is hovering around 311.8, with the Bollinger Bands upper and lower bounds (303.6 - 315.9) squeezing the market into a dried Dead Sea scroll, and the RSI at 53.3 is like a bronze blunt instrument unearthed and oxidized, lukewarm and dull. What exactly is the market waiting for—a new excavation report, or just another collective hallucination?
Historically, before every dynasty collapse, similar auspicious omens were spread among the common folk. The current chip turnover is nothing more than replacing the Ming Dynasty Chongzhen era's extra three levies with today's on-chain liquidations. Losses don't need eulogies; they are just the most standard gravity deposits in stratigraphy, even making one want to open a can of soda in the excavation square and laugh at this absurd cycle.
Before this man-made ruin is completely carbonized, just measure the excavation depth of the stratigraphic fault zone.
- Target: $BCH 🟢
- Entry: 308.0 - 312.0
- TP1: 320.0
- TP2: 328.5
- SL: 298.0
The probe is stuck in the hard soil layer at 298.0; if it breaks through, it proves that below is all quicksand. 🏛️🔍
#CoinMoveAlert#Anthropic拟11月启动IPO，目标于感恩节前上市# If this tech narrative comes true, it may briefly boost risk appetite in the crypto market, but SLX is still showing independent weakness. My judgment is that the rebound is unlikely to change the downward structure. The current price is 0.06285, down 1.6% in 24h, having retraced 16.26% from the 4-hour high. The trading volume is only 2.516 million, and the funding rate of 0.0050% shows longs are still paying. The open interest of 28.168 million coin-margined contracts shows no panic liquidation. The order book buy/sell ratio is 1.20, with buy orders slightly dominant, but in a downtrend, such support is easily eaten away. Risk control priority: If it rebounds to 0.06425, you can lightly try shorting, stop loss at 0.06575, target 0.06115; if it sharply falls and stabilizes near 0.06085, you can lightly try to catch the rebound, stop loss at 0.05955, target 0.06345. Single position should not exceed 5% of total funds; if stop loss is hit, you must exit unconditionally.
——This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wish you smooth trading.——
$SLX#Anthropic拟11月启动IPO，目标于感恩节前上市
#Anthropic拟11月启动IPO，目标于感恩节前上市 $SLX